Subspace, Cosmological interpretation:

Subspace, Cosmological interpretation:
Coined by the theoretician Jakob Steen Madsen, the word denotes the presence of an absolute vacuum.
Interpretational variations on the phenomenon exist.

Stephen Goodfellow interprets subspace on an  interstellar magnitude, as a spherical volume in space sustained by a rotating (see dynamo effect) magnetically repulsive high energy plasma. The resulting subspace volume  induces gravity (gravity without a corresponding quantity of mass,) causing space to implode on the subspace, thus an equilibrium is maintained. Possible matter manufacture (as per virtual particle production,) and time dilation at the boundary may have further implications.

Goodfellow’s subspace solar model from “Can Gravity be Induced?”

Gravitational Induction update Sept 20th, 2010

Gravitational Induction update Sept 20th, 2010

Over the past month I have managed to obtain access to online scientific journals. How ironic that scientific research - the cult of objectivity and progress - is still steeped in medieval guild-culture. In an age where the diffusion of knowledge is becoming wide-spread, these important papers of research are not made available to the unwashed public; only universities and research establishments have the luxury to be able to afford full access. It ain’t right.

With a few hours of poking around, I found the closest match to a researcher capable of determining if a high-energy plasma can induce gravity.
Of course, Dr. Niansheng Qi* who works for the L-3 Company is concentrating on plasma densities and not actually looking for a gravitational induction effect, but I wondered if his tools might be capable of discerning it.

Emailing him, I asked if the data revealed any laser disturbance outside the plasma sheath, to which he replied in the negative, which of course was a great disappointment for me.

I can only console myself with the hope that a gravitationally induced ‘tug’ or shift towards the plasma implosion would be very weak and would not register on anything but the most sensitive laser-optical interferometer. I am to understand that the most precise lasers can measure a disturbance at 1 x 10 to the -15m.
A lesser magnification reveals a flat-line, but higher magnification?

I will keep looking and asking around - perhaps there are other researchers out there with more precise instruments who are willing to look a little closer at their data.

*Magnetic Field Diffusion and Enhanced Resistivity in 12-cm-Diameter 200-ns 3.5-MA Z-Pinch Implosions